Assurance across the programme.
Add a consistent evidence layer to assessments intended to authenticate learning, supporting standards, moderation and appeals.
Integrevise for University of Bristol
Integrevise turns a submitted assignment into a short adaptive oral discussion grounded in Bristol’s existing brief, rubric and the student’s own work. Faculty receive reviewable evidence of individual understanding; students receive personalised feedback—without scheduling a live viva for every submission.
Value at every level
Integrevise adds a practical evidence layer while preserving Bristol's assessment framework, academic judgement and the tasks faculty already use.
Add a consistent evidence layer to assessments intended to authenticate learning, supporting standards, moderation and appeals.
Retain current briefs, rubrics and academic judgement while reviewing structured explanations instead of running synchronous viva timetables.
Give students clear feedback and a chance to demonstrate reasoning whether AI was permitted, limited or excluded.
Evidence before adoption
Integrevise's adaptive oral approach has been evaluated in a university setting and published in the peer-reviewed journal Trends in Higher Education.
Read the peer-reviewed studyDirectly aligned with Bristol
Bristol's four assessment-use categories and its Assessment and Feedback Strategy distinguish AI-integrated work from tasks that independently authenticate learning. Integrevise makes that direction operational by adding direct evidence of understanding without becoming a detector or replacing academic judgement.
A simple next step
A short conversation is enough to compare priorities, explore fit and decide whether the approach deserves a closer look.
Book a 20-minute conversation No preparation, module selection or assessment redesign needed.